GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  1. DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
  2. MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4 Pro100/100100/10034/10081/1000/10068/100
MiMo-V2.6-Pro47/100100/10061/10092/10067/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.74/ 1M
$0.47/ 1M
Output
$3.48/ 1M
$0.94/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.005/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
540K
98K
Completed sessions
1,378,040
468,417
Token share
0.64%
0.18%
Tokens
6.6T-80%
1.9T+100%
AUG 23OCT 17
AUG 23OCT 17
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
60.7%56K user-weeks
64.1%2.7K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.